<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Examples of alternative water supply options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/</link>
	<description>Would you build a huge industrial plant here ?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/?p=1624#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian,
The 25 GL figure is realistic for those that wish to have a rainwater tank (hence the requirement that the owner pays half the cost). This also means the tanks are likely to be maintained, as the owners wanted them and have an investment in them. This 25 GL comes from only 8% of suitable houses having tanks installed per year over 3 years, let alone industry and other buildings. See the Marsden Jacobs report, and work by Assoc Prof Peter Coombs for detail.
See the video by Chris Walsh on stormwater (EXPERT OPINION button at top of page). Also check out the testimony to the Parliamentary water inquiry on water options for Melbourne, and the SKM report on alternative options that the government tried to bury, and it was only released after successive FOI requests by Clean Oceans Foundation.
Cheers,
Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian,<br />
The 25 GL figure is realistic for those that wish to have a rainwater tank (hence the requirement that the owner pays half the cost). This also means the tanks are likely to be maintained, as the owners wanted them and have an investment in them. This 25 GL comes from only 8% of suitable houses having tanks installed per year over 3 years, let alone industry and other buildings. See the Marsden Jacobs report, and work by Assoc Prof Peter Coombs for detail.<br />
See the video by Chris Walsh on stormwater (EXPERT OPINION button at top of page). Also check out the testimony to the Parliamentary water inquiry on water options for Melbourne, and the SKM report on alternative options that the government tried to bury, and it was only released after successive FOI requests by Clean Oceans Foundation.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/?p=1624#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Neil - you have an interesting concept of "full cost of each option".
Couple of notes/comments:
1. 25 GL of supply from rainwater tanks would cost double that of desalinated water, and have 60% of the ongoing costs. Needs a lot more explanation as to why this is seen as a viable alternative, especially when one considers the significantly increased public health risk of numerous household water supplies prone to contamination, lack of maintenance etc.
2. Rationale behind stormwater capture is very airy fairy - storing in disconnected local reservoirs, old quarries, unspecified aquifers as well as new purpose built storages.

Surely this posting is a summary of more detailed reports that should be provided, so the assumptions and conclusions could be reviewed and argued?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil - you have an interesting concept of &#8220;full cost of each option&#8221;.<br />
Couple of notes/comments:<br />
1. 25 GL of supply from rainwater tanks would cost double that of desalinated water, and have 60% of the ongoing costs. Needs a lot more explanation as to why this is seen as a viable alternative, especially when one considers the significantly increased public health risk of numerous household water supplies prone to contamination, lack of maintenance etc.<br />
2. Rationale behind stormwater capture is very airy fairy - storing in disconnected local reservoirs, old quarries, unspecified aquifers as well as new purpose built storages.</p>
<p>Surely this posting is a summary of more detailed reports that should be provided, so the assumptions and conclusions could be reviewed and argued?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watershed Victoria &#8212; Archive &#187; Age Editorial opinion on desalination funding crisis and asking why the alternative water supply options aren&#8217;t being considered</title>
		<link>http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Watershed Victoria &#8212; Archive &#187; Age Editorial opinion on desalination funding crisis and asking why the alternative water supply options aren&#8217;t being considered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/?p=1624#comment-210</guid>
		<description>[...] to &#8216;Tech Talk&#8217; or Click here to see what some of the other alternatives are.       Features, Making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to &#8216;Tech Talk&#8217; or Click here to see what some of the other alternatives are.       Features, Making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watershed Victoria &#8212; Archive &#187; Energy use in new water projects is spiraling out of control</title>
		<link>http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/content/2009/02/examples-of-alternative-water-supply-options/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Watershed Victoria &#8212; Archive &#187; Energy use in new water projects is spiraling out of control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watershedvictoria.org.au/?p=1624#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to see how alternative water supply options could source the same amount of water at up t... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to see how alternative water supply options could source the same amount of water at up t&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

